NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB with 96 GB HBM3e and 16,896 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 2,471.82% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

56.6

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

56.6
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +2,300% 96 ГБ ×2 (192 ГБ)
4 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 4.10 TB/s ×2 (8.2 TB/s)
124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

4,096 бит ×2 (8192 бит) 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +3,941% 248.3 TFLOPS
6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +1,921% 62.08 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +3,942% 31.04 TFLOPS
0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +2,100% 16,896 ×2 (33792)
768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 132
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

10.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,665
🔥 +20% 2,000

Boost Clock

1,837
🔥 +9% 2,000

Memory Clock

🔥 +3% 2,000
1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

1000 W
🔥 -92% 75 W

Recommended PSU

1400 W
🔥 -82% 250 W

Power Connector

No None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +1,550% 528 ×2 (1056)
32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

🔥 +1,150% 50 MB
4 MB

Additional

Slots

🔥 SXM Module
Single-slot

Release Date

July 17, 2024 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying