Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

Comparison of Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 with 16 GB HBM2 and 5,120 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 by 422.34% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

12.6

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

12.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 +300% 16 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 HBM2

Memory Bandwidth

96.13 GB/s 829.4 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 4,096 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

22.27 TFLOPS
🔥 +5% 23.49 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +12,028% 1,425.0 TFLOPS
11.75 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS
🔥 +13,086% 5.873 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

512
🔥 +900% 5,120

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Volta

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

4
🔥 +1,900% 80

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1
🔥 7.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +144% 1,354
555

Boost Clock

🔥 +21% 1,392
1,147

Memory Clock

🔥 +85% 1,502
810

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -81% 47 W
250 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -67% 200 W
600 W

Power Connector

None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

32
🔥 +900% 320

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 6 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

May 21, 2020 July 17, 2020

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying