NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 with 16 GB HBM2 and 5,120 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 471.82% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

12.6

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

12.6
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +300% 16 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM2 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

829.4 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

4,096 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +282% 23.49 TFLOPS
6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +282% 11.75 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +665% 5.873 TFLOPS
0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +567% 5,120
768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Volta Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 80
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

7.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

555
🔥 +260% 2,000

Boost Clock

1,147
🔥 +74% 2,000

Memory Clock

810
🔥 +139% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

250 W
🔥 -70% 75 W

Recommended PSU

600 W
🔥 -58% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +900% 320
32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

🔥 +50% 6 MB
4 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

July 17, 2020 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying