NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

Comparison of NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI and 16 cores vs NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB with 141 GB HBM3e and 16,896 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

0.0

NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

0.0
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

67.4

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

67.4

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

No
🔥 141 ГБ

Memory Type

DDR2 HBM3e

Memory Bandwidth

6.400 GB/s
🔥 4.89 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

64 бит 6,144 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 267.6 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

35.2 TFLOPS
🔥 +90% 66.91 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

No
🔥 33.45 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

16
🔥 +105,500% 16,896

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Tesla 2.0 Hopper

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

2
🔥 +6,500% 132

PCIe Version

PCI PCIe 5.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

1.2
🔥 9.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,500

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,980

Memory Clock

400
🔥 +298% 1,593

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -96% 31 W
700 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -82% 200 W
1100 W

Power Connector

None 8-pin EPS

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

8
🔥 +6,500% 528

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

32 KB
🔥 +56% 50 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (UNSET)

3 534 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp16)

3 553 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

2 444 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp16)

40.8 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp8)

25.3 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-8b (fp8)

5 161 tokens/s

MLPerf, deepseek-r1 (fp8)

1 113 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

7 132 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

Single-slot
🔥 SXM Module

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2009 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

No outputs
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying