NVIDIA H200 NVL vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of NVIDIA H200 NVL with 141 GB HBM3e and 16,896 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA H200 NVL outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 2,792.73% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA H200 NVL

63.6

NVIDIA H200 NVL

63.6
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +3,425% 141 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 4.89 TB/s
124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

6,144 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +3,827% 241.3 TFLOPS
6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +1,864% 60.32 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +3,827% 30.16 TFLOPS
0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +2,100% 16,896
768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Hopper Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 132
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

9.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,365
🔥 +47% 2,000

Boost Clock

1,785
🔥 +12% 2,000

Memory Clock

1,593
🔥 +22% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

600 W
🔥 -88% 75 W

Recommended PSU

1000 W
🔥 -75% 250 W

Power Connector

8-pin EPS None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +1,550% 528
32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

🔥 +1,150% 50 MB
4 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp4)

7 436 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp4)

130.5 tokens/s

MLPerf, deepseek-r1 (fp4)

2 327 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying