Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort vs NVIDIA P102-101

Comparison of Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs NVIDIA P102-101 with 10 GB GDDR5 and 3,200 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms NVIDIA P102-101 by 821.6% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA P102-101

7.1

NVIDIA P102-101

7.1

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 4 ГБ
10 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

96.13 GB/s 320.3 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 320 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 22.27 TFLOPS
167.0 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +13,230% 1,425.0 TFLOPS
10.69 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS
0.334 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 512
3,200

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 4
25

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x4

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 1,354
1,557

Boost Clock

🔥 1,392
1,670

Memory Clock

🔥 1,502
2,002

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -81% 47 W
250 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -67% 200 W
600 W

Power Connector

None 2x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 32
200

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 +40,860% 1024 KB
2.5 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

May 21, 2020 July 16, 2018

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying