GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000 with 1 GB GDDR5 and 192 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB outperforms NVIDIA Quadro 2000 by 87.26% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

46.5

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

46.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro 2000

24.8

NVIDIA Quadro 2000

24.8

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +3,100% 32 ГБ
1 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR7 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.79 TB/s
41.60 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 115.5 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 115.5 TFLOPS
480.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +4,412% 1.805 TFLOPS
0.04 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +11,233% 21,760
192

RT Cores

🔥 170
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 Fermi

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +4,150% 170
4

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 12.0
2.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,017
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,655
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +169% 1,750
650

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

575 W
🔥 -89% 62 W

Recommended PSU

950 W
🔥 -74% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +2,025% 680
32

ROP

🔥 170
No

L2 Cache

🔥 96 MB
256 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 Dec. 24, 2010

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort

Renting is cheaper than buying