NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of NVIDIA Quadro 4100 with 2 GB DDR3 and 1,344 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView outperforms NVIDIA Quadro 4100 by 37.5% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA Quadro 4100

1.6

NVIDIA Quadro 4100

1.6
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 ГБ
🔥 +100% 4 ГБ

Memory Type

DDR3 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

57.02 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

2.142 TFLOPS
🔥 +43% 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.08926 TFLOPS
🔥 +760% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,344
🔥 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Kepler Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

3.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Boost Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Memory Clock

891
🔥 +117% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -53% 35 W
75 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -20% 200 W
250 W

Power Connector

No None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

112
🔥 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

512 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

No Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying