NVIDIA Quadro CX vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of NVIDIA Quadro CX with 1 GB GDDR3 and 192 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA Quadro CX outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 1,293.64% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA Quadro CX

30.7

NVIDIA Quadro CX

30.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

1 ГБ
🔥 +300% 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR3 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

76.80 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

384 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

462.3 TFLOPS
🔥 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.05779 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,229% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

192
🔥 +300% 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Tesla 2.0 Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

24 No

PCIe Version

PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

1.3 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Boost Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Memory Clock

800
🔥 +142% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

150 W
🔥 -50% 75 W

Recommended PSU

450 W
🔥 -44% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

64
🔥 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

192 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Nov. 11, 2008 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying