Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Comparison of Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M with 1,024 GB GDDR3 and 128 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 4 ГБ
1,024 MB

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR3

Memory Bandwidth

96.13 GB/s 51.20 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 22.27 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +404,730% 1,425.0 TFLOPS
0.352 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS
No

CUDA Cores

🔥 +300% 512
128

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Tesla

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 4
16

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-HE

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 6.1
1.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 1,354
No

Boost Clock

🔥 1,392
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +88% 1,502
800

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -37% 47 W
75 W

Recommended PSU

200 W No

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 32
64

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 +1,500% 1024 KB
64 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot MXM Module

Release Date

May 21, 2020 Aug. 14, 2008

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying