NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 with 768 GB GDDR3 and 96 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

768 MB
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR3 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

67.20 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

384 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

0.2304 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,233% 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

No
🔥 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

96
🔥 +700% 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Tesla Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

12 No

PCIe Version

PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

1.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Boost Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Memory Clock

700
🔥 +177% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

134 W
🔥 -44% 75 W

Recommended PSU

300 W
🔥 -17% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

24
🔥 +33% 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

96 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

March 5, 2007 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

2x DVI
1x S-Video
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying