AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Comparison of AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X with 288 GB HBM3e and 16,384 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000 with 4 GB GDDR5 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X outperforms NVIDIA Quadro M2000 by 5,401.18% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X

93.5

AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X

93.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

1.7

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

1.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +7,100% 288 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 8.19 TB/s
105.8 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

8,192 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 629.1 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +4,303% 78.64 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +140,781% 78.64 TFLOPS
0.05582 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +2,033% 16,384
768

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

CDNA 4.0 Maxwell 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 5.2

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +26% 1,000
796

Boost Clock

🔥 +106% 2,400
1,163

Memory Clock

🔥 +21% 2,000
1,653

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

1400 W
🔥 -95% 75 W

Recommended PSU

1800 W
🔥 -86% 250 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +2,033% 1,024
48

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
1024 KB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (mxfp4)

10 129 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (mxfp4)

252.4 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

OAM Module Single-slot

Release Date

July 15, 2025 April 8, 2016

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying