NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of NVIDIA Quadro M2000 with 4 GB GDDR5 and 768 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView outperforms NVIDIA Quadro M2000 by 29.41% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

1.7

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

1.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

105.8 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

1.786 TFLOPS
🔥 +72% 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.05582 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,276% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

768
🔥 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Maxwell 2.0 Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

5.2 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

796
🔥 +151% 2,000

Boost Clock

1,163
🔥 +72% 2,000

Memory Clock

1,653
🔥 +17% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

75 W 75 W

Recommended PSU

250 W 250 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

48
🔥 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

April 8, 2016 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying