NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparison of NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 with 5 GB GDDR5 and 1,024 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms NVIDIA Quadro P2000 by 919.29% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro P2000

2.5

NVIDIA Quadro P2000

2.5

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +1,500% 80 ГБ
5 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 2.04 TB/s
140.2 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

5,120 бит 160 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +65% 77.97 TFLOPS
47.36 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

🔥 311.84 TFLOPS
No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

🔥 155.92
No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +543% 19.49 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +10,189% 9.746 TFLOPS
0.09472 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +575% 6,912
1,024

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +1,250% 108
8

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 8.0
6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +7% 1,155
1,076

Boost Clock

🔥 1,410
1,480

Memory Clock

🔥 1,593
1,752

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

400 W
🔥 -81% 75 W

Recommended PSU

800 W
🔥 -69% 250 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +575% 432
64

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 40 MB
1280 KB

Additional

Slots

🔥 SXM Module
Single-slot

Release Date

Aug. 11, 2022 Feb. 6, 2017

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying