GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4

Comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4 with 4 GB GDDR3 and 240 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4 outperforms GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB by 4.28% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

46.5

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

46.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4

48.5

NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4

48.5

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +700% 32 ГБ
4 ГБ ×4 (16 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR7 GDDR3

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.79 TB/s
102.4 GB/s ×4 (409.6 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 512 бит ×4 (2048 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 115.5 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 115.5 TFLOPS
622.1 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +2,221% 1.805 TFLOPS
0.07776000000000001 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +8,967% 21,760
240 ×4 (960)

RT Cores

🔥 170
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 Tesla 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +467% 170
30

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 12.0
1.3

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,017
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,655
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +119% 1,750
800

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -4% 575 W
600 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -5% 950 W
1000 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin No

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +750% 680
80 ×4 (320)

ROP

🔥 170
No

L2 Cache

🔥 96 MB
256 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot No

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 July 25, 2008

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying