NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparison of NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 with 24 GB GDDR6 and 4,608 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 by 113.79% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

12.1

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

12.1

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +233% 80 ГБ
24 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 2.04 TB/s
672.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

5,120 бит 384 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +139% 77.97 TFLOPS
32.62 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

🔥 311.84 TFLOPS
No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

🔥 155.92
No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +19% 19.49 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,812% 9.746 TFLOPS
0.5098 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +50% 6,912
4,608

RT Cores

No 72

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere Turing

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +50% 108
72

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 8.0
7.5

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 1,155
1,440

Boost Clock

🔥 1,410
1,770

Memory Clock

🔥 1,593
1,750

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

400 W
🔥 -35% 260 W

Recommended PSU

800 W
🔥 -25% 600 W

Power Connector

None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +50% 432
288

ROP

No 72

L2 Cache

🔥 +567% 40 MB
6 MB

Additional

Slots

🔥 SXM Module
Dual-slot

Release Date

Aug. 11, 2022 Aug. 13, 2018

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C

Renting is cheaper than buying