NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server

Comparison of NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB with 141 GB HBM3e and 16,896 cores vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server with 96 GB GDDR7 and 24,064 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB outperforms NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server by 17.24% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

67.4

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

67.4
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server

57.5

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server

57.5

Expert Comparison

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB обладает более высокой пропускной способностью (4.89 TB/s против 1.79 TB/s) и большей памятью (141 ГБ HBM3e против 96 ГБ GDDR7), что делает его предпочтительным для требовательных задач, таких как обработка больших объемов данных и машинное обучение. Однако NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server предлагает больше ядер (24064 против 16896) и выше производительность FP32 (126.0 TFLOPS против 66.91 TFLOPS), что делает его лучшим выбором для графической обработки и сложных симуляций.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +47% 141 ГБ
96 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR7

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 +173% 4.89 TB/s
1.79 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

6,144 бит 512 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +112% 267.6 TFLOPS
126.0 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

66.91 TFLOPS
🔥 +88% 126.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,600% 33.45 TFLOPS
1.968 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

16,896
🔥 +42% 24,064

RT Cores

No
🔥 188

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Hopper Blackwell 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

132
🔥 +42% 188

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 5.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

9.0
🔥 12.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,500
🔥 +6% 1,590

Boost Clock

1,980
🔥 +32% 2,617

Memory Clock

1,593
🔥 +10% 1,750

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

700 W
🔥 -14% 600 W

Recommended PSU

1100 W
🔥 -9% 1000 W

Power Connector

8-pin EPS 1x 16-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

528
🔥 +42% 752

ROP

No
🔥 188

L2 Cache

🔥 50 MB
128 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (UNSET)

3 534 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp16)

3 553 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp4)

3 250 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

2 444 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp16)

40.8 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp8)

25.3 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-8b (fp4)

5 758 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-8b (fp8)

5 161 tokens/s

Geekbench AI, FP16

53 322 points

Geekbench AI, INT8

28 264 points

Geekbench AI, FP32

37 299 points

MLPerf, deepseek-r1 (fp8)

1 113 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

🔥 +89% 7 132 tokens/s
3 767 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

🔥 SXM Module
Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 March 18, 2025

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b

Renting is cheaper than buying