Palit GTX 780 Super JetStream vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of Palit GTX 780 Super JetStream with 3 GB GDDR5 and 2,304 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Palit GTX 780 Super JetStream outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 74.09% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Palit GTX 780 Super JetStream

3.8

Palit GTX 780 Super JetStream

3.8
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

3 ГБ
🔥 +33% 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

298.0 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

384 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

4.755 TFLOPS
🔥 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1981 TFLOPS
🔥 +288% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,304
🔥 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Kepler Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

3.5 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

980
🔥 +104% 2,000

Boost Clock

1,032
🔥 +94% 2,000

Memory Clock

1,552
🔥 +25% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

250 W
🔥 -70% 75 W

Recommended PSU

600 W
🔥 -58% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

192
🔥 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

1536 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

June 24, 2013 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying