Pegatron GT 230 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of Pegatron GT 230 with 1 GB DDR2 and 96 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Pegatron GT 230 outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 618.64% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Pegatron GT 230

15.8

Pegatron GT 230

15.8
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

1 ГБ
🔥 +300% 4 ГБ

Memory Type

DDR2 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

24.00 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

192 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

240.0 TFLOPS
🔥 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

No
🔥 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

96
🔥 +700% 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Tesla Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

12 No

PCIe Version

PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

1.1 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Boost Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Memory Clock

500
🔥 +287% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

75 W 75 W

Recommended PSU

250 W 250 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

48
🔥 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

48 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

April 27, 2009 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying