PowerColor R9 FURY X vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of PowerColor R9 FURY X with 4 GB HBM and 4,096 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

PowerColor R9 FURY X outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 255.0% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

PowerColor R9 FURY X

7.8

PowerColor R9 FURY X

7.8
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

512.0 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

4,096 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

8.602 TFLOPS
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

8.602 TFLOPS
🔥 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.5376000000000001 TFLOPS
🔥 +43% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

4,096
🔥 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 3.0 Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Boost Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Memory Clock

500
🔥 +287% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

275 W
🔥 -73% 75 W

Recommended PSU

600 W
🔥 -58% 250 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

256
🔥 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

2 MB
🔥 +100% 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

June 24, 2015 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying