AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs PowerColor Red Devil RX Vega 56 OC

Comparison of AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X with 192 GB HBM3 and 19,456 cores vs PowerColor Red Devil RX Vega 56 OC with 8 GB HBM2 and 3,584 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X outperforms PowerColor Red Devil RX Vega 56 OC by 965.69% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X

94.1

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X

94.1
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

PowerColor Red Devil RX Vega 56 OC

8.8

PowerColor Red Devil RX Vega 56 OC

8.8

Expert Comparison

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X значительно превосходит PowerColor Red Devil RX Vega 56 OC по многим параметрам: имеет больше ядер (19456 против 3584), большую память (192 ГБ HBM3 против 8 ГБ HBM2) и большую пропускную способность (10.3 TB/s против 409.6 GB/s). MI300X также имеет более высокую boost-частоту (2100 МГц против 1526 МГц) и TDP (750 Вт против 210 Вт). MI300X подходит для современных вычислений и AI задач, тогда как RX Vega 56 OC лучше для графики и игр.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +2,300% 192 ГБ
8 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM3 HBM2

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 10.3 TB/s
409.6 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

8,192 бит 2,048 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +2,888% 653.7 TFLOPS
21.88 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +647% 81.72 TFLOPS
10.94 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +11,854% 81.72 TFLOPS
0.6836 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +443% 19,456
3,584

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

CDNA 3.0 GCN 5.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 1,000
1,308

Boost Clock

🔥 +38% 2,100
1,526

Memory Clock

🔥 +216% 2,525
800

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

750 W
🔥 -72% 210 W

Recommended PSU

1150 W
🔥 -52% 550 W

Power Connector

None 2x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +443% 1,216
224

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 +300% 16 MB
4 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (UNSET)

1 983 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp16)

1 740 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

1 057 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (UNSET)

30.4 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp16)

34.8 tokens/s

llama.cpp, llama-2-7b-Q4_0

232.9 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

5 975 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

OAM Module Dual-slot

Release Date

Dec. 6, 2023 Nov. 28, 2017

Display Outputs

No outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x HDMI 2.0b
2x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying