Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort vs Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

Comparison of Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2 with 3 GB GDDR5 and 2,048 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2 by 1,656.95% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

3.7

Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

3.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +33% 4 ГБ
3 ГБ ×2 (6 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

96.13 GB/s 307.2 GB/s ×2 (614.4 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 384 бит ×2 (768 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 22.27 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +31,525% 1,425.0 TFLOPS
4.506 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS
No

CUDA Cores

🔥 512
2,048 ×2 (4096)

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal GCN 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 4
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +35% 1,354
1,000

Boost Clock

🔥 +27% 1,392
1,100

Memory Clock

🔥 1,502
1,600

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -87% 47 W
375 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -73% 200 W
750 W

Power Connector

None 3x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 32
128 ×2 (256)

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 +33% 1024 KB
768 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

May 21, 2020 No

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying