NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

Comparison of NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores vs Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2 with 3 GB GDDR5 and 2,048 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB outperforms Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2 by 585.29% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

3.7

Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

3.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +2,567% 80 ГБ
3 ГБ ×2 (6 ГБ)

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.94 TB/s
307.2 GB/s ×2 (614.4 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

5,120 бит 384 бит ×2 (768 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 77.97 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

🔥 311.84 TFLOPS
No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

🔥 155.92
No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +333% 19.49 TFLOPS
4.506 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 9.746 TFLOPS
No

CUDA Cores

🔥 +238% 6,912
2,048 ×2 (4096)

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere GCN 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 108
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

8.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +6% 1,065
1,000

Boost Clock

🔥 +28% 1,410
1,100

Memory Clock

🔥 1,512
1,600

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -20% 300 W
375 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -7% 700 W
750 W

Power Connector

8-pin EPS 3x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +238% 432
128 ×2 (256)

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 80 MB
768 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

June 28, 2021 No

Display Outputs

No outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying