NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

Comparison of NVIDIA CMP 70HX with 8 GB GDDR6X and 3,840 cores vs Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2 with 3 GB GDDR5 and 2,048 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA CMP 70HX outperforms Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2 by 105.08% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA CMP 70HX

7.7

NVIDIA CMP 70HX

7.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

3.7

Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

3.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +167% 8 ГБ
3 ГБ ×2 (6 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR6X GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

608.3 GB/s 307.2 GB/s ×2 (614.4 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 384 бит ×2 (768 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 10.71 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +138% 10.71 TFLOPS
4.506 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 0.1674 TFLOPS
No

CUDA Cores

🔥 +88% 3,840
2,048 ×2 (4096)

RT Cores

🔥 30
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere GCN 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 30
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 1.0 x4 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

8.6 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +36% 1,365
1,000

Boost Clock

🔥 +27% 1,395
1,100

Memory Clock

🔥 1,188
1,600

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

unknown 375 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -73% 200 W
750 W

Power Connector

1x 12-pin 3x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 120
128 ×2 (256)

ROP

🔥 30
No

L2 Cache

🔥 4 MB
768 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

July 16, 2021 No

Display Outputs

No outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying