NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

Comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER with 16 GB GDDR7 and 8,960 cores vs Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2 with 3 GB GDDR5 and 2,048 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER outperforms Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2 by 434.49% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

20.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

20.0
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

3.7

Sapphire ATOMIC R9 280X2

3.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +433% 16 ГБ
3 ГБ ×2 (6 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR7 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

896.0 GB/s 307.2 GB/s ×2 (614.4 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 384 бит ×2 (768 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 43.94 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +875% 43.94 TFLOPS
4.506 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 0.6866 TFLOPS
No

CUDA Cores

🔥 +338% 8,960
2,048 ×2 (4096)

RT Cores

🔥 70
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 GCN 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 70
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

12.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +130% 2,295
1,000

Boost Clock

🔥 +123% 2,452
1,100

Memory Clock

🔥 +9% 1,750
1,600

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -7% 350 W
375 W

Recommended PSU

750 W 750 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin 3x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +119% 280
128 ×2 (256)

ROP

🔥 70
No

L2 Cache

🔥 48 MB
768 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

July 17, 2025 No

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying