GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB vs Sapphire GT 230

Comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs Sapphire GT 230 with 1 GB DDR2 and 96 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB outperforms Sapphire GT 230 by 193.86% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

46.5

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

46.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Sapphire GT 230

15.8

Sapphire GT 230

15.8

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +3,100% 32 ГБ
1 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR7 DDR2

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.79 TB/s
24.00 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 192 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 115.5 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 115.5 TFLOPS
240.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 1.805 TFLOPS
No

CUDA Cores

🔥 +22,567% 21,760
96

RT Cores

🔥 170
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 Tesla

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +1,317% 170
12

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 12.0
1.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,017
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,655
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +250% 1,750
500

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

575 W
🔥 -87% 75 W

Recommended PSU

950 W
🔥 -74% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +1,317% 680
48

ROP

🔥 170
No

L2 Cache

🔥 +100% 96 MB
48 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 April 27, 2009

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying