Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort vs Sapphire PULSE RX 6800

Comparison of Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs Sapphire PULSE RX 6800 with 16 GB GDDR6 and 3,840 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Sapphire PULSE RX 6800 by 526.41% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Sapphire PULSE RX 6800

10.5

Sapphire PULSE RX 6800

10.5

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 +300% 16 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

96.13 GB/s 512.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

22.27 TFLOPS
🔥 +50% 33.33 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +8,448% 1,425.0 TFLOPS
16.67 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS
No

CUDA Cores

512
🔥 +650% 3,840

RT Cores

No
🔥 60

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal RDNA 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 4
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,354
🔥 +33% 1,800

Boost Clock

1,392
🔥 +56% 2,170

Memory Clock

1,502
🔥 +33% 2,000

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -81% 47 W
250 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -67% 200 W
600 W

Power Connector

None 2x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

32
🔥 +650% 240

ROP

No
🔥 60

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Triple-slot

Release Date

May 21, 2020 Oct. 28, 2020

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying