GALAX RTX 5090 D HOF OC LAB XOC vs Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact OC

Comparison of GALAX RTX 5090 D HOF OC LAB XOC with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact OC with 2 GB GDDR5 and 1,792 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

GALAX RTX 5090 D HOF OC LAB XOC outperforms Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact OC by 1,714.84% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GALAX RTX 5090 D HOF OC LAB XOC

46.5

GALAX RTX 5090 D HOF OC LAB XOC

46.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact OC

2.6

Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact OC

2.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +1,500% 32 ГБ
2 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR7 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.79 TB/s
176.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +3,373% 115.5 TFLOPS
3.326 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +3,373% 115.5 TFLOPS
3.326 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +768% 1.805 TFLOPS
0.2079 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +1,114% 21,760
1,792

RT Cores

🔥 170
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 GCN 3.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 170
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

12.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,017
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,655
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +27% 1,750
1,375

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

575 W
🔥 -67% 190 W

Recommended PSU

950 W
🔥 -53% 450 W

Power Connector

🔥 +100% 2x 16-pin
1x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +507% 680
112

ROP

🔥 170
No

L2 Cache

🔥 96 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

Triple-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 Sept. 2, 2014

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2

1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying