NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB vs Sapphire R9 295X2 OC

Comparison of NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores vs Sapphire R9 295X2 OC with 4 GB GDDR5 and 2,816 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms Sapphire R9 295X2 OC by 452.03% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Sapphire R9 295X2 OC

4.7

Sapphire R9 295X2 OC

4.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +1,900% 80 ГБ
4 ГБ ×2 (8 ГБ)

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 2.04 TB/s
332.8 GB/s ×2 (665.6 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

5,120 бит 512 бит ×2 (1024 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 77.97 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

🔥 311.84 TFLOPS
No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

🔥 155.92
No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +236% 19.49 TFLOPS
5.801 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,244% 9.746 TFLOPS
0.7251000000000001 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +145% 6,912
2,816 ×2 (5632)

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere GCN 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 108
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

8.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 1,155
No

Boost Clock

🔥 1,410
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +23% 1,593
1,300

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -20% 400 W
500 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -11% 800 W
900 W

Power Connector

None 2x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +145% 432
176 ×2 (352)

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 40 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

🔥 SXM Module
Dual-slot

Release Date

Aug. 11, 2022 April 29, 2014

Display Outputs

No outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying