Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 with 4 GB GDDR5 and 2,560 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 92.73% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Sapphire Tri-X R9 290

4.2

Sapphire Tri-X R9 290

4.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

320.0 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

4.9 TFLOPS
🔥 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.6125 TFLOPS
🔥 +25% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,560
🔥 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 2.0 Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Boost Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Memory Clock

1,250
🔥 +55% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

275 W
🔥 -73% 75 W

Recommended PSU

600 W
🔥 -58% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

160
🔥 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Jan. 2, 2014 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying