SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView vs XFX Speedster QICK 308 RX 6650 XT ULTRA

Comparison of SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores vs XFX Speedster QICK 308 RX 6650 XT ULTRA with 8 GB GDDR6 and 2,048 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

XFX Speedster QICK 308 RX 6650 XT ULTRA outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 182.73% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XFX Speedster QICK 308 RX 6650 XT ULTRA

6.2

XFX Speedster QICK 308 RX 6650 XT ULTRA

6.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 +100% 8 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s 280.3 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

64 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

6.144 TFLOPS
🔥 +259% 22.03 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

3.072 TFLOPS
🔥 +258% 11.01 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +12% 0.768 TFLOPS
0.6884 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

768
🔥 +167% 2,048

RT Cores

6
🔥 +433% 32

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.7 RDNA 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

2,000
🔥 +8% 2,153

Boost Clock

2,000
🔥 +34% 2,689

Memory Clock

1,937
🔥 +13% 2,190

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -57% 75 W
176 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -44% 250 W
450 W

Power Connector

None 1x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

32
🔥 +300% 128

ROP

6
🔥 +433% 32

L2 Cache

🔥 +100% 4 MB
2 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 May 10, 2022

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying