SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView vs ZOTAC GTX 680

Comparison of SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores vs ZOTAC GTX 680 with 2 GB GDDR5 and 1,536 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ZOTAC GTX 680 outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 16.82% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ZOTAC GTX 680

2.6

ZOTAC GTX 680

2.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +100% 4 ГБ
2 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s 192.3 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

64 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 6.144 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 3.072 TFLOPS
3.25 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +467% 0.768 TFLOPS
0.1354 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 768
1,536

RT Cores

🔥 6
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.7 Kepler

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 3.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +99% 2,000
1,006

Boost Clock

🔥 +89% 2,000
1,058

Memory Clock

🔥 +29% 1,937
1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -62% 75 W
195 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -44% 250 W
450 W

Power Connector

None 2x 6-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 32
128

ROP

🔥 6
No

L2 Cache

🔥 4 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 March 22, 2012

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying