SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView vs VisionTek CryoVenom R9 290

Comparison of SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores vs VisionTek CryoVenom R9 290 with 4 GB GDDR5 and 2,560 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

VisionTek CryoVenom R9 290 outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 122.27% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

VisionTek CryoVenom R9 290

4.9

VisionTek CryoVenom R9 290

4.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 4 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s 371.2 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

64 бит 512 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 6.144 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 3.072 TFLOPS
6.016 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +2% 0.768 TFLOPS
0.752 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 768
2,560

RT Cores

🔥 6
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.7 GCN 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,000
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,000
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +34% 1,937
1,450

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -73% 75 W
275 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -58% 250 W
600 W

Power Connector

None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 32
160

ROP

🔥 6
No

L2 Cache

🔥 4 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 Nov. 5, 2013

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying