SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView vs VisionTek R9 Nano

Comparison of SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores vs VisionTek R9 Nano with 4 GB HBM and 4,096 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

VisionTek R9 Nano outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 245.91% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

VisionTek R9 Nano

7.6

VisionTek R9 Nano

7.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 4 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 HBM

Memory Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s 512.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

64 бит 4,096 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 6.144 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 3.072 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +50% 0.768 TFLOPS
0.512 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 768
4,096

RT Cores

🔥 6
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.7 GCN 3.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,000
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,000
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +287% 1,937
500

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -57% 75 W
175 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -44% 250 W
450 W

Power Connector

None 1x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 32
256

ROP

🔥 6
No

L2 Cache

🔥 +100% 4 MB
2 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 Aug. 27, 2015

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying