SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView vs XENON GTX 760 JetStream

Comparison of SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores vs XENON GTX 760 JetStream with 2 GB GDDR5 and 1,152 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

XENON GTX 760 JetStream outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 4.55% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XENON GTX 760 JetStream

2.3

XENON GTX 760 JetStream

2.3

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +100% 4 ГБ
2 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s 198.4 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

64 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 6.144 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +17% 3.072 TFLOPS
2.62 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +603% 0.768 TFLOPS
0.1092 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 768
1,152

RT Cores

🔥 6
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.7 Kepler

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 3.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +87% 2,000
1,072

Boost Clock

🔥 +76% 2,000
1,137

Memory Clock

🔥 +25% 1,937
1,550

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -56% 75 W
170 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -44% 250 W
450 W

Power Connector

None 2x 6-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 32
96

ROP

🔥 6
No

L2 Cache

🔥 4 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 June 26, 2013

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying