Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort vs XFX BC-160

Comparison of Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs XFX BC-160 with 8 GB HBM2 and 2,304 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms XFX BC-160 by 784.39% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XFX BC-160

7.4

XFX BC-160

7.4

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 +100% 8 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 HBM2

Memory Bandwidth

96.13 GB/s 512.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 2,048 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +51% 22.27 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +19,227% 1,425.0 TFLOPS
7.373 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS
🔥 +935% 0.4608 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

512
🔥 +350% 2,304

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal RDNA 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 4
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +35% 1,354
1,000

Boost Clock

1,392
🔥 +15% 1,600

Memory Clock

🔥 +50% 1,502
1,000

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -69% 47 W
150 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -56% 200 W
450 W

Power Connector

None 2x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

32
🔥 +350% 144

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

May 21, 2020 Dec. 13, 2021

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying