SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView vs XFX BC-160

Comparison of SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores vs XFX BC-160 with 8 GB HBM2 and 2,304 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

XFX BC-160 outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 237.73% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XFX BC-160

7.4

XFX BC-160

7.4

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 +100% 8 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 HBM2

Memory Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s 512.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

64 бит 2,048 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

6.144 TFLOPS
🔥 +140% 14.75 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

3.072 TFLOPS
🔥 +140% 7.373 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +67% 0.768 TFLOPS
0.4608 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

768
🔥 +200% 2,304

RT Cores

🔥 6
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.7 RDNA 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +100% 2,000
1,000

Boost Clock

🔥 +25% 2,000
1,600

Memory Clock

🔥 +94% 1,937
1,000

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -50% 75 W
150 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -44% 250 W
450 W

Power Connector

None 2x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

32
🔥 +350% 144

ROP

🔥 6
No

L2 Cache

4 MB 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 Dec. 13, 2021

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying