NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs XFX Double D R9 270X

Comparison of NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores vs XFX Double D R9 270X with 2 GB GDDR5 and 1,280 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB outperforms XFX Double D R9 270X by 1,024.12% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XFX Double D R9 270X

2.3

XFX Double D R9 270X

2.3

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +3,900% 80 ГБ
2 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.94 TB/s
179.2 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

5,120 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 77.97 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

🔥 311.84 TFLOPS
No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

🔥 155.92
No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +625% 19.49 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +5,701% 9.746 TFLOPS
0.168 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +440% 6,912
1,280

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere GCN 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 108
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

8.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +6% 1,065
1,000

Boost Clock

🔥 +34% 1,410
1,050

Memory Clock

🔥 +8% 1,512
1,400

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

300 W
🔥 -40% 180 W

Recommended PSU

700 W
🔥 -36% 450 W

Power Connector

8-pin EPS 2x 6-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +440% 432
80

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 80 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

June 28, 2021 Oct. 8, 2013

Display Outputs

No outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2

2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying