Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort vs XFX R9 380 Double Dissipation

Comparison of Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs XFX R9 380 Double Dissipation with 2 GB GDDR5 and 1,792 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms XFX R9 380 Double Dissipation by 2,379.62% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XFX R9 380 Double Dissipation

2.7

XFX R9 380 Double Dissipation

2.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +100% 4 ГБ
2 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

96.13 GB/s 176.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +528% 22.27 TFLOPS
3.548 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +40,063% 1,425.0 TFLOPS
3.548 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS
0.22180000000000002 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 512
1,792

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal GCN 3.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 4
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 1,354
No

Boost Clock

🔥 1,392
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +9% 1,502
1,375

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -75% 47 W
190 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -56% 200 W
450 W

Power Connector

None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 32
112

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 +100% 1024 KB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

May 21, 2020 June 18, 2015

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying