SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView vs XFX RX 560D Double Dissipation

Comparison of SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores vs XFX RX 560D Double Dissipation with 4 GB GDDR5 and 896 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView outperforms XFX RX 560D Double Dissipation by 19.57% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XFX RX 560D Double Dissipation

1.8

XFX RX 560D Double Dissipation

1.8

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 4 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s 96.00 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

64 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +187% 6.144 TFLOPS
2.143 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +43% 3.072 TFLOPS
2.143 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +473% 0.768 TFLOPS
0.134 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 768
896

RT Cores

🔥 6
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.7 GCN 4.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +83% 2,000
1,090

Boost Clock

🔥 +67% 2,000
1,196

Memory Clock

🔥 +29% 1,937
1,500

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

75 W
🔥 -13% 65 W

Recommended PSU

250 W 250 W

Power Connector

None 1x 6-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 32
56

ROP

🔥 6
No

L2 Cache

🔥 4 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 July 4, 2017

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying