GALAX RTX 5090 D HOF OC LAB XOC vs ZOTAC GTX 760 Perak

Comparison of GALAX RTX 5090 D HOF OC LAB XOC with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs ZOTAC GTX 760 Perak with 2 GB GDDR5 and 1,152 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

GALAX RTX 5090 D HOF OC LAB XOC outperforms ZOTAC GTX 760 Perak by 2,002.26% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GALAX RTX 5090 D HOF OC LAB XOC

46.5

GALAX RTX 5090 D HOF OC LAB XOC

46.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ZOTAC GTX 760 Perak

2.2

ZOTAC GTX 760 Perak

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +1,500% 32 ГБ
2 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR7 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.79 TB/s
192.3 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 115.5 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +4,576% 115.5 TFLOPS
2.47 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,654% 1.805 TFLOPS
0.1029 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +1,789% 21,760
1,152

RT Cores

🔥 170
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 Kepler

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 170
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 12.0
3.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +100% 2,017
1,006

Boost Clock

🔥 +148% 2,655
1,072

Memory Clock

🔥 +17% 1,750
1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

575 W
🔥 -70% 170 W

Recommended PSU

950 W
🔥 -53% 450 W

Power Connector

🔥 2x 16-pin
2x 6-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +608% 680
96

ROP

🔥 170
No

L2 Cache

🔥 96 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

Triple-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 June 25, 2013

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying