SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView vs ZOTAC RTX 4090 Trinity

Comparison of SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores vs ZOTAC RTX 4090 Trinity with 24 GB GDDR6X and 16,384 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ZOTAC RTX 4090 Trinity outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 1,357.27% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ZOTAC RTX 4090 Trinity

32.1

ZOTAC RTX 4090 Trinity

32.1

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 +500% 24 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6X

Memory Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s
🔥 1.01 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

64 бит 384 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

6.144 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,244% 82.58 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

3.072 TFLOPS
🔥 +2,588% 82.58 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 0.768 TFLOPS
No

CUDA Cores

768
🔥 +2,033% 16,384

RT Cores

6
🔥 +2,033% 128

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.7 Ada Lovelace

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 128

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.9

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

2,000
🔥 +12% 2,235

Boost Clock

2,000
🔥 +26% 2,520

Memory Clock

🔥 +48% 1,937
1,313

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -83% 75 W
450 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -71% 250 W
850 W

Power Connector

None 1x 16-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

32
🔥 +1,500% 512

ROP

6
🔥 +2,033% 128

L2 Cache

4 MB
🔥 +1,700% 72 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Quad-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 Sept. 20, 2022

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying