NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB vs ZOTAC RTX 5080 SOLID CORE

Comparison of NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB with 141 GB HBM3e and 16,896 cores vs ZOTAC RTX 5080 SOLID CORE with 16 GB GDDR7 and 10,752 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB outperforms ZOTAC RTX 5080 SOLID CORE by 190.06% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

67.4

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

67.4
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ZOTAC RTX 5080 SOLID CORE

23.2

ZOTAC RTX 5080 SOLID CORE

23.2

Expert Comparison

NVIDIA H200 SXM с архитектурой Hopper значительно превосходит ZOTAC RTX 5080 SOLID CORE в производительности благодаря большему количеству ядер (16896 против 10752), большей памяти (141 ГБ HBM3e против 16 ГБ GDDR7) и гораздо более высокой пропускной способности (4.89 TB/s против 960.0 GB/s). H200 SXM также имеет более высокую TDP (700 Вт против 360 Вт), что позволяет ему выдавать лучшие результаты в сложных вычислительных задачах, таких как машинное обучение и научные вычисления.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +781% 141 ГБ
16 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR7

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 4.89 TB/s
960.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

6,144 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +375% 267.6 TFLOPS
56.28 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +19% 66.91 TFLOPS
56.28 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +3,704% 33.45 TFLOPS
0.8793 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +57% 16,896
10,752

RT Cores

No
🔥 84

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Hopper Blackwell 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +57% 132
84

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 5.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

9.0
🔥 12.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,500
🔥 +53% 2,295

Boost Clock

1,980
🔥 +32% 2,617

Memory Clock

1,593
🔥 +18% 1,875

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

700 W
🔥 -49% 360 W

Recommended PSU

1100 W
🔥 -32% 750 W

Power Connector

8-pin EPS 1x 16-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +57% 528
336

ROP

No
🔥 84

L2 Cache

50 MB
🔥 +28% 64 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (UNSET)

3 534 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp16)

3 553 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

2 444 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp16)

40.8 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp8)

25.3 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-8b (fp8)

5 161 tokens/s

MLPerf, deepseek-r1 (fp8)

1 113 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

7 132 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

🔥 SXM Module
Triple-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 Jan. 30, 2025

Display Outputs

No outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b

Renting is cheaper than buying